AMAPPAMAPP

Have your say

Why are psychologists treated differently?

A consultation on the TGA's rules for psychedelic-assisted therapy. Your submission will inform AMAPP's request for review, and you choose whether your individual words go to the regulators or stay with AMAPP.

Make a submission

Open 19 August to mid-October 2026

Our mission

To create a trusted and ethical space for psychedelic-assisted therapy practitioners to thrive.

Peer Support

A connected, multidisciplinary community honouring professional expertise and lived experience.

Advocacy

Equitable, safe and ethical psychedelic-assisted therapy for clients, community and practitioners.

Trust

Research integrated into real-world practice with rigour, wisdom and openness.

Read our mission and pillars in full

What changed

A broader draft became a narrower rule.

In May 2026 the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) confirmed a new rule on who can serve on the therapy team for psychedelic-assisted therapy. It took effect in the TGA's published guidance in June 2026.

The current rule

Every therapy team must include at least one member registered as: a clinical psychologist holding an area of practice endorsement, a medical practitioner, a nurse with mental health experience, or an occupational therapist. Within psychology, only endorsed clinical psychologists qualify. Most registered psychologists cannot fill the role, whatever their training, supervised experience or clinical trial work.

The October 2025 draft

"The PAT dyad must include at least one therapist who is registered with a National Board with regulatory oversight of psychotherapy, specifically, the Psychology Board, Medical Board, or Nursing and Midwifery Board."

No endorsement requirement. Under that wording, any registered psychologist would have qualified.

Between the draft and the final rule, something shifted. The consultation feedback pointed the other way. Of 29 stakeholder responses, 15 agreed that other health practitioners should be considered for the lead therapist role, 9 disagreed, and 5 were unclear. In the TGA's own October 2025 outcomes paper: "Only around one third of respondents supported the current therapy dyad model."

Respondents included state health departments, Authorised Prescriber psychiatrists, peak professional bodies and research ethics committees. The TGA's internal brief recorded that most respondents advocated for broader inclusion, citing rural and regional access, workforce shortages, and culturally safe models of care.

The TGA's stated reasons for holding the line were two: no National Board has an approved program of study, endorsement or category of registration specifically designed for psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy, and the absence of statutory powers for self-regulating professional bodies such as PACFA or the ACA.

Both points were equally true in October 2025, when the TGA proposed the broader rule. And the first point cuts both ways: clinical endorsement is not a psychedelic-assisted therapy qualification either.

What this means

The gate falls on practitioners, patients and whole teams.

For practitioners

The endorsement requirement closes the mandatory role to most registered psychologists. An endorsement requires an approved postgraduate qualification plus a 3,000-hour supervised registrar program, a commitment of several years, and it contains no psychedelic-assisted therapy content.

For patients

Fewer eligible practitioners means narrower access, longer waits and higher costs, and the effect lands hardest in regional Australia, where the consultation itself said workforce is thinnest.

For teams

A generally registered or counselling psychologist working with a social worker, counsellor or psychotherapist cannot form the minimum team, because none of them can fill the required role. Partnerships built through clinical trials may not continue in their current form.

For regulatory consistency

Four professions face four thresholds: endorsement for psychology, general registration for medicine, registration plus experience for nursing, registration alone for occupational therapy. In the consultation record, the other three Boards each supported their general registrants. Psychology alone was narrowed.

What should change

Return to the TGA's own draft.

AMAPP is asking the TGA to reconsider the current rule and return to its own October 2025 position: any registered psychologist should be able to fill the required role on the therapy team, with suitability determined by demonstrated competency rather than title.

This is not a radical ask. It is what the TGA's own draft proposed. It is the direction most consultation respondents supported. It is how the same review treated medicine, nursing and occupational therapy. The same evidence will go to the Psychology Board of Australia, whose advice shaped the rule and whose own wording makes it provisional.

In their own words, the settings are provisional

The Psychology Board's advice to the TGA was framed to apply "until evidence base grows". The TGA describes access as "strictly controlled while the evidence base develops". We are asking what evidence would change the rule, and we are gathering it.

We are collecting perspectives from registered health professionals, practitioners in self-regulated professions, people with lived experience, consumers, carers and family members, researchers, professional bodies and advocacy organisations.

How submissions work

You control everything.

1. Public or private?

Your words go to the regulators (public) or stay with AMAPP (private). AMAPP always includes your voice in the overall report. If you choose private, your individual submission never leaves AMAPP and is never quoted anywhere.

2. Named or anonymous?

Your identity can be named, anonymous, or described in general terms, for example "a registered psychologist". This choice affects only the regulatory submissions, never public campaign material.

What happens to your words

  • All submissions are reviewed by AMAPP before anything is lodged with the TGA and the Psychology Board of Australia
  • We reserve the right to withhold any submission that is abusive or would put anyone at risk; if yours is affected, we contact you
  • If you choose public, your words may be quoted in campaign material, but only if you give permission, and never with your name unless you explicitly consent to that too
  • Before we lodge with the TGA and the Psychology Board, every contributor gets two weeks notice, with the chance to withdraw or amend

Data security

  • Submissions are stored in AMAPP's own secure Google account, never forwarded to personal emails or drives
  • Access is restricted to two named AMAPP key-holders, with one Board member holding governance oversight under a signed confidentiality agreement
  • Data is held for seven years in line with AMAPP's records policy, then securely destroyed

Publication safeguards

This campaign is about public health policy, workforce competency and regulatory review, not the promotion of psychedelics or services. AMAPP's public material is factual, balanced and non-promotional. It does not promote psychedelics, psychedelic medicines, clinics, practitioners or commercial services, and does not present submissions as treatment testimonials. Ahpra advertising requirements and the TGA's prohibition on public advertising of Schedule 8 medicines, including MDMA and psilocybine, are respected throughout. AMAPP retains final editorial discretion, and even anonymised quotes are reviewed for identifying details before publication.

Share your submission

Five to ten minutes, on your terms.

To protect our community, please

  • Do not promote psychedelics or psychedelic medicines
  • Do not name or promote clinics, practitioners or commercial services
  • Do not frame your submission as a treatment testimonial or a claim about treatment benefits
  • Keep it about policy, workforce, competency and access: that is what the TGA can act on

Complete the form right here on this page, or open it full screen:

Open the form in a new tab

Prefer full screen, or the form did not load above?

Open the form in a new tab

Trouble with the form? Email your submission to info@amapp.org.au and we will record it for you.

Timeline and questions

What happens next.

19 August 2026

Submissions open. Share your perspective.

Mid-October

Submissions close. AMAPP begins review and compilation.

Late October

Every contributor receives two weeks notice, with the chance to withdraw or amend.

November

AMAPP lodges the compilation and overall report with the TGA and the Psychology Board of Australia.

Questions about the campaign, the form, or your submission: info@amapp.org.au